BAUS 2015

A cost consequence analysis for utilising intermittent ADXBLADDER testing in the follow up of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, compared to standard care
BAUS ePoster online library. McCracken S. 06/22/21; 319001; p10-12 Disclosure(s): Paid consultant of Arquer Diagnostics Ltd
Stuart McCracken
Stuart McCracken
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Introduction
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is one of the most expensive cancers to manage, with a high recurrence rate and high costs associated with surveillance. We present an economic analysis for introducing an ADXBLADDER-based surveillance strategy, performed in place of flexible cystoscopy at alternating visits, to elucidate cumulative associated costs compared to the current standard practice.

Materials & methods
Analysis included 1431 patients from a large prospective study previously carried out. A Markov model, utilizing 4 health states and 3 risk groups, was constructed to determine the average 5-year costs of 2 strategies: a conventional strategy (flexible cystoscopy at every follow-up visit) and an intervention (ADXBLADDER testing instead of cystoscopy at alternate follow-up visits). An NHS perspective was adopted in the analysis, in-line with NICE recommendations in the cost-consequence analysis (CCA), reporting average cost per patient and commissioning perspective in budget impact model reporting total costs of the 2 strategies.

Results
The major driver of costs was disease progression, frequent cystoscopic surveillance, and costs associated with an undetected progression. There was no statistically significant difference in the probability of moving between disease states between the 2 surveillance strategies. Performance characteristics for ADXBLADDER compared to flexible cystoscopy improved with NMIBC disease severity. The cumulative costs of care differed significantly dependent on NMIBC risk.

Conclusion
Differential healthcare costs of the 2 strategies were demonstrated. The data from the modelling supports a strategy which could enable an improvement in quality of care and economic outcomes for NMIBC, including cost-savings by reducing unnecessary procedures.
Introduction
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is one of the most expensive cancers to manage, with a high recurrence rate and high costs associated with surveillance. We present an economic analysis for introducing an ADXBLADDER-based surveillance strategy, performed in place of flexible cystoscopy at alternating visits, to elucidate cumulative associated costs compared to the current standard practice.

Materials & methods
Analysis included 1431 patients from a large prospective study previously carried out. A Markov model, utilizing 4 health states and 3 risk groups, was constructed to determine the average 5-year costs of 2 strategies: a conventional strategy (flexible cystoscopy at every follow-up visit) and an intervention (ADXBLADDER testing instead of cystoscopy at alternate follow-up visits). An NHS perspective was adopted in the analysis, in-line with NICE recommendations in the cost-consequence analysis (CCA), reporting average cost per patient and commissioning perspective in budget impact model reporting total costs of the 2 strategies.

Results
The major driver of costs was disease progression, frequent cystoscopic surveillance, and costs associated with an undetected progression. There was no statistically significant difference in the probability of moving between disease states between the 2 surveillance strategies. Performance characteristics for ADXBLADDER compared to flexible cystoscopy improved with NMIBC disease severity. The cumulative costs of care differed significantly dependent on NMIBC risk.

Conclusion
Differential healthcare costs of the 2 strategies were demonstrated. The data from the modelling supports a strategy which could enable an improvement in quality of care and economic outcomes for NMIBC, including cost-savings by reducing unnecessary procedures.
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies