BAUS 2015

HoLEP for urinary retention: how effective is it?
BAUS ePoster online library. Georgiades F. 06/21/21; 319073; p3-5 Disclosure(s): Tev Aho has received honoraria from Lumenis Ltd and Boston Scientific Corporation
Fanourios Georgiades
Fanourios Georgiades
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Introduction

No comparisons of catheter-free rates after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for acute vs non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention (AUR and NNCUR) have been published previously. It is unclear whether long-term surveillance is indicated after HoLEP for high pressure chronic urinary retention (HPCUR) to monitor for deterioration in renal function.

Patients and Methods

A prospectively maintained database of the first 500 consecutive HoLEP cases performed under the care of a single surgeon was analysed retrospectively. Urodynamic studies did not play a role in the decision making process for those with AUR or NNCUR. NNCUR was defined as painless with PVR>300ml in those who could void and initial catheter drainage >1,000ml in those who could not void.

Results

280/500 (56%) were in UR: AUR in 195 and NNCUR in 85, including 22 with HPCUR. Although only 58.8% with NNCUR passed first TWOC vs 84.6% with AUR, 98.8% vs 98.9% respectively were catheter-free at 3 months. No patient with HPCUR had clinically significant deterioration in serum creatinine after HoLEP for HPCUR at median follow-up of 60 months.

Conclusions
HoLEP has 3-month catheter-free rates > 98.5% for both AUR and NNCUR in patients not pre-selected by UDS. Those with AUR are more likely to pass first TWOC than those with NNCUR. HoLEP is a durable treatment for HPCUR and we found no evidence of recurrent HPCUR in the long term.
Introduction

No comparisons of catheter-free rates after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for acute vs non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention (AUR and NNCUR) have been published previously. It is unclear whether long-term surveillance is indicated after HoLEP for high pressure chronic urinary retention (HPCUR) to monitor for deterioration in renal function.

Patients and Methods

A prospectively maintained database of the first 500 consecutive HoLEP cases performed under the care of a single surgeon was analysed retrospectively. Urodynamic studies did not play a role in the decision making process for those with AUR or NNCUR. NNCUR was defined as painless with PVR>300ml in those who could void and initial catheter drainage >1,000ml in those who could not void.

Results

280/500 (56%) were in UR: AUR in 195 and NNCUR in 85, including 22 with HPCUR. Although only 58.8% with NNCUR passed first TWOC vs 84.6% with AUR, 98.8% vs 98.9% respectively were catheter-free at 3 months. No patient with HPCUR had clinically significant deterioration in serum creatinine after HoLEP for HPCUR at median follow-up of 60 months.

Conclusions
HoLEP has 3-month catheter-free rates > 98.5% for both AUR and NNCUR in patients not pre-selected by UDS. Those with AUR are more likely to pass first TWOC than those with NNCUR. HoLEP is a durable treatment for HPCUR and we found no evidence of recurrent HPCUR in the long term.
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies